Feminism, self-identity, and professional identity are some of the reasons why many married women decide to keep their maiden name. In addition to the option of keeping their maiden name, women are also hyphenating by combining their maiden name with their husband’s surname. Sometimes the new combination is even passed down to the couple’s children. It can be downright confusing.
The fundamental rationale for women changing their names upon marriage is based on the idea that in marriage, a woman subsumes her identity (I should be arrested for making that statement) under her husband’s. For many women this contradicts a principle to which they are truly committed, the equality of partners in a marriage.
Personally I am neither for nor against it. Call me ignorant if you like, and perhaps it is because I am a man, I just don’t see why it is that important and whether it makes a real difference. All I ask for is that you don’t wave it around like a banner at a political rally. It is the same with guys who have names like, Simon Edcott III or who name their penises.
If you need to ride the coat tails of your family name to make a statement or get somewhere in life, then what does it say about you personally?
Calling yourself Ms. used to be a feminist standard. It declared who you were: a liberal, a supporter of women’s rights, an independent thinker, a working woman, an admirer of Gloria Steinem. Now it has become an almost quaint moniker.
You are probably asking yourself why I chose to blog about this when by my admission it means so little to me.
Well, I was attending a reception on Friday night when I was introduced to a married couple. His name was Steve Jones* and she went by the name of Jennifer Smith*.
I found this very unusual, so I politely inquired why this is so.
The husband kept quiet. I guess he was just tired of being asked the same question. The wife however launched into a lengthy discussion on women’s rights and why she chose to retain her maiden name. She cited all of the aforementioned reasons. From being equal partners to how odd it is that men aren’t expected to change their names to her self-identity. I expected her to break into a rendition of “We shall overcome” at any minute.
I was slightly taken aback, if not surprised by her “passion”. It just seemed that she was making too much of an issue in answering a simple question. A simple “I chose to keep my maiden name for professional reasons” would have satisfied my curiosity. After all, I was just trying to make polite conversation.
Unbeknownst to both of us a young black man was listening intently to our (or rather her) conversation. When she was done speaking, he interrupted and said.
“If I understand you correctly… you chose not to take your husband’s surname as a means of asserting your equality and your independence as a modern woman.
“You could put it that way…yes”, she said.
“So you decided to take another man’s name instead?”
“I think you may have misunderstood. Smith* is my maiden name”
“But you maiden name is really your father’s name, is it not?”
[silence]
I politely excused myself and walked away. The guy may no have been very original (I’ve actually heard this used before), but damn he was spot on with that comment!
(* not their real names)
Like licking honey off a thorn
March 25, 2007 by chitty



Interesting because this is very argument I had w. the British Embassy when I was changing passports. Bottom line, they said I must use my husband’s name, or my father’s name, but could not use my own legal name. (I won in the end, stupid battle, but seemed important to me at the time.) Saw you over at Andrea’s btw.
I kept my maiden name and took my husband’s name. I did not hyphenate. My maiden name was the name I was born with and the first thing given to me in life, I keep it as a second middle name, if you will. Legally, I have two identities. My name takes up two lines on my Driver’s License… LOL… I like it like that. I go by my married name for convenience and continuity.
There is another reason some (maybe many!) women stick to their fathers’ surnames : in the event of divorce, the return to Square One is less irksome! Imagine Elizabeth Taylor, Zza Gabor, Susan Rossiter and others having to go through all that paperwork each time for a new ‘phone listing!
Personally, I don’t really have any point of view with regards to the surname thing – I am obviously not a very deep person. However, I will say I really like that young black guy’s style. Hee hee!
my last name is difficult to spell and even more difficult to pronounce (especially for foreignors). I guess that would be about the only reason i’d change it, although my inherent laziness brings up the hassle of changing email addresses, dealing with home affairs, getting new credit cards, changing my signature… blegh. I guess in the end, if I had been the woman in question my answer would have been “apathy”.
I’m neither here nor there with the surname thing – although my boyfriend and I joke that if we were to get married in SA, he’d have to take my surname (his is one of the decidedly unrevered Afrikaans ones, always gets black people’s backs up, understandably).
Anyhow, a woman once gave me a rather interesting reason for prefering the use of ‘Ms’ over ‘Miss’ or ‘Mrs’ – she pointed out a man’s title never gives away his marital status, he could be single or married and no-one would know the difference. She disliked the fact that women’s titles gives that away, which irritated her, so she always used ‘Ms’ to keep that wee bit more anonymity.
I took my husband’s surname for practical reasons. You check into a hotel as “Mr and Mrs” but your passport has a different name… it’s a pain in the ass. However… it took me 5 years to change my name in my EU passport (so I had 2 different identities which really appealed to me – a SA one in one name and an EU one in another name – Take That, Big Brother!!!) Seriously though, it took me that long because a tiny bit of me felt like that passport was the last piece of my own identity. Funny, since I got the new passport it doesn’t seem so important anymore but nobody ever said women were uncomplicated.
Bibi: Thanks for stopping by. Did they say why you weren’t allowed to use your legal name? Sounds stupid to me too.
Beauty: Two lines on your driver’s license! Do you get many tickets? Ha ha.
dinahmoh: Makes you wonder how committed these women were to marriage in the first place.
Katt: I like his style too. Certainly gave Jennifer Smith something to think about… I hope.
moonflake: Apathy is good enough for me. Short and to the point.
TWA: Is his surname Terreblanche or Botha perhaps?
Got to give it to your friend… she has a sense of humour about the whole thing.
Terri: Sometimes we hang onto things or sentimental reasons and when you think bout it afterwards you realise that was all it was.
I see only the ladies are responding.
. Lol.
I understand why women would want to retain their self -identity when they are married. The right name can convey character, bestow distinction, and make an impression that lasts.
Problem with just keeping a name is that it means little if it is just for cosmetic reasons and if you are only keeping it in case of divorce. Names can be powerful and if you absolutely have to have a certain name at least do something with it.
“Your guy’s”comment was right on the nose. People will use all kinds of arguments to justify a decision. When you do that at make sure that it can withstand a challenge and fair criticism.
Hi Came through Andrea ’s post…just one comment….name chaging actually should not be ” THE” issue….issue is do people connect in heart when they get married…!
BTW – in our world ( some parts) its not just surnames even first names gets changed…for girls !! And in some parts husband and kids all take wife/Mother’s name….!!
I totally disagree with the man who challenged “Jennifer Smith” that she was only keeping one mans name rather than another. It is VERY different to keep the name you have had from birth irrespective of whether it came from a man. What establishes the inequality of the woman changing her name is that men expect to have the same name all their life whilst women’s surnames are expected to be defined by their relationships with men. I agree that because of the naming system that has been in place for the past 200 or so years in many Western countries that the surname is likely to be derived from a man but that doesn’t mean it’s right, nor does it mean that it shouldn’t be challenged.